I am not in the high school setting, but I think the high school in our area uses a lot of college prep courses into senior year. They do have a CTE program that does look more similar to a studio school. While I think it would be challenging to get used to, I can see the benefits. Some advantages I see are that students are working in teams and are completing practical projects that would really prepare them for a career right out of high school. A disadvantage would be that I do not think it would be for every student or every content area. There are still times when lectures are necessary.
The Studio School Geoff Mulgan describes is very different from the traditional schools I’ve taught in. Its heavy focus on project-based learning, real-world skill development, and teamwork is a big contrast to the more structured, test-driven environment I’m used to. I love the idea of students learning through hands-on projects and authentic experiences, and I think it would create a powerful sense of purpose and engagement. However, I haven’t had much experience teaching in a fully project-based model, so stepping into that role would feel like a big shift. If I were a teacher at a Studio School, I would enjoy the creativity, collaboration, and flexibility it offers, but I might struggle with the lack of traditional structure at first. Still, I think it would be exciting to grow in that environment and learn how to guide students through deeper, more meaningful learning experiences.
Compare and contrast the Studio School with your school. Imagine being a teacher at a school like the Studio School. What would you like? What would you dislike?
I think what he described is nothing like what we have in our school. Yes, I think schools have some project-based classes and hands on curriculum but it's not the main focus like in the studio schools. My school does offer CTE classes that students could take that is kind of like his idea.
Some of the likes/dislikes: He mentioned at the end where these schools focus on a specific area and it reminds me of trade schools after graduation. It also raises a question that it will put a lot of pressure on elementary and middle school teachers. Not to be negative but I truly believe there is no way that kids that don't enjoy traditional school could go to a studio school focusing on engineering and do well without an extensive background in math and science. On the more positive side, these schools let the kids pick their interests and run with it and we all know students excel better when doing things they love.
Studio schools are more focused on project based lessons whereas in a regular school it is more one size fits all. I believe that this is due to large class sizes, lack of funding and honestly lack of training. Studio schools are able to focus on how to think about a problem instead of what to think. There are a lot of things about a studio school that I would enjoy. I think having the opportunity to be more creative with my lessons, form better relationships, and see students working through real world problems would be amazing. I think what I would dislike is the grading of all the projects as well as preparing and having all the set up. That could be more challenging!
Studio Schools focus more on practical learning and preparing students for life, rather than just exams. Compared to my school, the Studio School is much more hands-on. Students work on real-life projects. In my school, learning is classroom-based and focused on subjects, exams, and passing. We do some group work, but grades still measure student success.
If I were a teacher at a Studio School, I would like the practical lessons. Teaching would feel more interesting and relevant. I would struggle with how unpredictable the lessons or work could be. In my opinion, it would be harder to make sure students learn all the academic content they need.
As a band teacher, I already have a small mix of studio school in my teaching. During full band rehearsals, I definitely fall less into the studio school structure and don't have many projects, although I would love to find good projects to incorporate into my rehearsals. My individual lessons fall more into studio school style. The lessons are geared toward the student and focus on them learning the skill with me there as a coach.
Studio school focus on project based learning and team work. School today has a more structure what they need to teach/ cover for the school year. Going off course can be harder to do with the number of kids taught in the regular classroom at one time. Studio school has a smaller number which can make it easier for them to focus on certain area that interest the students.
I think having the flexibility of how to teach the students and making it more practical to their life. It would help make the students more engage during the learning process and teachers would see more excitement in their students. I think today we have so much material to cover during the school year. We are so focus on that and making sure our students are ready for the next school year. If we can also put more excitement and do more project base learning in school. I think we would see an increase excitement in the students learning and the students would want to be more hands on in their learning. I see students more excited about the material if they can do science experiment on a subject than just reading about it in the classroom and doing a packet. Letting students being more hands on with their learning would benefit everyone. It would also help the students be well rounded when they go off to college or into the work force.
Yes, I think I would like a studio school. It would take me awhile to get used to because I have never taught this way. I think the students would benefit greatly with this way of teaching.
A Studio school is different from my school by being much smaller and giving the students the ability to utilize their knowledge rather than regurgitate what they quickly memorize. I like that Studio Schools are giving the chance to excel in school to kids who learn by using their hands and can apply their skills. I do believe that this will help many students who do not do well with just sitting and listening. In fact many high school students don't even listen in school much anymore they have earbuds or music playing while they just sit in a classroom. I don't like that this would completely erase what people in school have don't before. I believe that this is a good option, but it should be an option not a be all end all. There are some kids who do do well by sitting and listening and learn best that way.
The Studio school is much smaller. The Middle School I teach in has close to 700 kids. A smaller school gives teachers the opportunity to really know and engage with students, and vice versa. Also, the Studio school is an engaging, get your hands dirty, and collaborate with each other environment . That is not seen much in my school except for science classes. I think teaching in a Studio School could be really challenging for a teacher. You would have to be open to new ideas from students, and be willing to change or adapt your teaching when challenged by students. I think a teacher in a Studio school would have to be confident in their ability to lead their students. I would like the ability to move around and learn by doing. I'm not sure what I would dislike, but it would be interesting to find out!
Geoff Mulgan describes the Studio School as a place “where work and learning are integrated.” I think I would love this setup, as it seems engaging, hands-on, and directly applicable for students. It aligns with my belief in making learning meaningful and relevant. The only aspect I might dislike is being the pioneer of such a program—I would want the chance to learn from others first before taking on that full responsibility.
I love the idea of Studio Schools. I think having learning relevant instruction and hands on skills is something that is beneficial for so many. We can't think of education as a one size fits all. I love the idea of practical lessons as an educator. It is so helpful for both the child and the educator. I love a hands-on lesson that is directly applicable to students.
Geoff Mulgan, in his TED talk, describes the Studio School. Compare and contrast the Studio School with your school. Imagine being a teacher at a school like the Studio School. What would you like? What would you dislike?
As a middle school teacher I see some distinct contrasts between the "mainstream" school and "studio" school models. The biggest is that it's more hands-on and outcome based preparing students real-world problem solving rather than just regurgitation of memorized facts. In my school we offer a few similar options like Mass Customized Learning and our CTE program. At the high school they have more opportunities with the school partnering with local businesses and secondary education. I like the fact that students have choice in their education, opportunities to explore real occupations, and can also earn college credit. What I disliked is that at the middle school those opportunities are fairly limited and outcomes would be harder to measure.
I am not in the high school setting, but I think the high school in our area uses a lot of college prep courses into senior year. They do have a CTE program that does look more similar to a studio school. While I think it would be challenging to get used to, I can see the benefits. Some advantages I see are that students are working in teams and are completing practical projects that would really prepare them for a career right out of high school. A disadvantage would be that I do not think it would be for every student or every content area. There are still times when lectures are necessary.
ReplyDeleteThe Studio School Geoff Mulgan describes is very different from the traditional schools I’ve taught in. Its heavy focus on project-based learning, real-world skill development, and teamwork is a big contrast to the more structured, test-driven environment I’m used to. I love the idea of students learning through hands-on projects and authentic experiences, and I think it would create a powerful sense of purpose and engagement. However, I haven’t had much experience teaching in a fully project-based model, so stepping into that role would feel like a big shift. If I were a teacher at a Studio School, I would enjoy the creativity, collaboration, and flexibility it offers, but I might struggle with the lack of traditional structure at first. Still, I think it would be exciting to grow in that environment and learn how to guide students through deeper, more meaningful learning experiences.
ReplyDeleteCompare and contrast the Studio School with your school.
ReplyDeleteImagine being a teacher at a school like the Studio School. What would you like? What would you dislike?
I think what he described is nothing like what we have in our school. Yes, I think schools have some project-based classes and hands on curriculum but it's not the main focus like in the studio schools. My school does offer CTE classes that students could take that is kind of like his idea.
Some of the likes/dislikes: He mentioned at the end where these schools focus on a specific area and it reminds me of trade schools after graduation. It also raises a question that it will put a lot of pressure on elementary and middle school teachers. Not to be negative but I truly believe there is no way that kids that don't enjoy traditional school could go to a studio school focusing on engineering and do well without an extensive background in math and science. On the more positive side, these schools let the kids pick their interests and run with it and we all know students excel better when doing things they love.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteStudio schools are more focused on project based lessons whereas in a regular school it is more one size fits all. I believe that this is due to large class sizes, lack of funding and honestly lack of training. Studio schools are able to focus on how to think about a problem instead of what to think. There are a lot of things about a studio school that I would enjoy. I think having the opportunity to be more creative with my lessons, form better relationships, and see students working through real world problems would be amazing. I think what I would dislike is the grading of all the projects as well as preparing and having all the set up. That could be more challenging!
ReplyDeleteStudio Schools focus more on practical learning and preparing students for life, rather than just exams. Compared to my school, the Studio School is much more hands-on. Students work on real-life projects. In my school, learning is classroom-based and focused on subjects, exams, and passing. We do some group work, but grades still measure student success.
ReplyDeleteIf I were a teacher at a Studio School, I would like the practical lessons. Teaching would feel more interesting and relevant. I would struggle with how unpredictable the lessons or work could be. In my opinion, it would be harder to make sure students learn all the academic content they need.
As a band teacher, I already have a small mix of studio school in my teaching. During full band rehearsals, I definitely fall less into the studio school structure and don't have many projects, although I would love to find good projects to incorporate into my rehearsals. My individual lessons fall more into studio school style. The lessons are geared toward the student and focus on them learning the skill with me there as a coach.
ReplyDeleteStudio school focus on project based learning and team work. School today has a more structure what they need to teach/ cover for the school year. Going off course can be harder to do with the number of kids taught in the regular classroom at one time. Studio school has a smaller number which can make it easier for them to focus on certain area that interest the students.
ReplyDeleteI think having the flexibility of how to teach the students and making it more practical to their life. It would help make the students more engage during the learning process and teachers would see more excitement in their students. I think today we have so much material to cover during the school year. We are so focus on that and making sure our students are ready for the next school year. If we can also put more excitement and do more project base learning in school. I think we would see an increase excitement in the students learning and the students would want to be more hands on in their learning. I see students more excited about the material if they can do science experiment on a subject than just reading about it in the classroom and doing a packet. Letting students being more hands on with their learning would benefit everyone. It would also help the students be well rounded when they go off to college or into the work force.
Yes, I think I would like a studio school. It would take me awhile to get used to because I have never taught this way. I think the students would benefit greatly with this way of teaching.
A Studio school is different from my school by being much smaller and giving the students the ability to utilize their knowledge rather than regurgitate what they quickly memorize. I like that Studio Schools are giving the chance to excel in school to kids who learn by using their hands and can apply their skills. I do believe that this will help many students who do not do well with just sitting and listening. In fact many high school students don't even listen in school much anymore they have earbuds or music playing while they just sit in a classroom. I don't like that this would completely erase what people in school have don't before. I believe that this is a good option, but it should be an option not a be all end all. There are some kids who do do well by sitting and listening and learn best that way.
ReplyDeleteThe Studio school is much smaller. The Middle School I teach in has close to 700 kids. A smaller school gives teachers the opportunity to really know and engage with students, and vice versa. Also, the Studio school is an engaging, get your hands dirty, and collaborate with each other environment . That is not seen much in my school except for science classes. I think teaching in a Studio School could be really challenging for a teacher. You would have to be open to new ideas from students, and be willing to change or adapt your teaching when challenged by students. I think a teacher in a Studio school would have to be confident in their ability to lead their students. I would like the ability to move around and learn by doing. I'm not sure what I would dislike, but it would be interesting to find out!
ReplyDeleteGeoff Mulgan describes the Studio School as a place “where work and learning are integrated.” I think I would love this setup, as it seems engaging, hands-on, and directly applicable for students. It aligns with my belief in making learning meaningful and relevant. The only aspect I might dislike is being the pioneer of such a program—I would want the chance to learn from others first before taking on that full responsibility.
ReplyDeleteI love the idea of Studio Schools. I think having learning relevant instruction and hands on skills is something that is beneficial for so many. We can't think of education as a one size fits all. I love the idea of practical lessons as an educator. It is so helpful for both the child and the educator. I love a hands-on lesson that is directly applicable to students.
ReplyDelete
ReplyDeleteGeoff Mulgan, in his TED talk, describes the Studio School. Compare and contrast the Studio School with your school.
Imagine being a teacher at a school like the Studio School. What would you like? What would you dislike?
As a middle school teacher I see some distinct contrasts between the "mainstream" school and "studio" school models. The biggest is that it's more hands-on and outcome based preparing students real-world problem solving rather than just regurgitation of memorized facts. In my school we offer a few similar options like Mass Customized Learning and our CTE program. At the high school they have more opportunities with the school partnering with local businesses and secondary education. I like the fact that students have choice in their education, opportunities to explore real occupations, and can also earn college credit. What I disliked is that at the middle school those opportunities are fairly limited and outcomes would be harder to measure.